Celsius 41.11 (2004)
October 22, 2004Release Date
Plot.
Where to Watch.
Cast & Crew.
Michael Moore
Self (archive footage)
Richard Nixon
Self (archive footage)
Fred Thompson
Self
Yasser Arafat
Self (archive footage)
John Kerry
Self
Madeleine Albright
Self (archive footage)
Osama Bin Laden
Self (archive footage)
Tony Blair
Self (archive footage)
Tom Brokaw
Self (archive footage)
George W. Bush
Self (archive footage)
Fred Barnes
Self
Michael Barone
Self
Laura Bush
Self (archive footage)
Dick Cavett
Self (archive footage)
Chevy Chase
Self (archive footage)
Jacques Chirac
Self (archive footage)
Media.
Details.
Release DateOctober 22, 2004
StatusReleased
Running Time1h 12m
Content RatingR
Budget$1,000,000
Box Office$93,000
Genres
Last updated:
Wiki.
Celsius 41.11 is a 2004 political documentary film inspired by, and partially in response to Michael Moore's film Fahrenheit 9/11. The title was chosen because, according to the makers of the movie, 41.11 °C is "The Temperature at Which the Brain Begins to Die", which is the film's tag-line.The film addresses five charges made against George W. Bush in Moore's film and criticizes 2004 Democratic Presidential candidate John Kerry. It was released during the run-up to the 2004 United States Presidential general election.
It took six weeks to make Celsius 41.11. The production was funded and the film distributed to a limited number of movie theaters by Citizens United, a conservative political organization. Celsius 41.11 performed less well at the box office than comparable left-leaning documentaries and significantly poorer than Fahrenheit 9/11. The producer attributed this to voter fatigue and to a timetabling clash with the World Series.
The critics' response was described as "irk[ed]" by the BBC. A number of critics described the film as a campaign advertisement for George W. Bush. Several believed that the movie would appeal primarily to convinced supporters of George W. Bush and was unlikely to sway undecided voters or change the opinion of Kerry supporters. The critics felt the film shared the flaws of Fahrenheit 9/11 without sharing all of its virtues; in particular, it was criticised for a comparative lack of emotion. The reliability of some of the individuals interviewed was questioned by The New York Times and The Boston Globe. Critics frequently compared the style to that of a PowerPoint presentation with some adding that the speed with which the film had been produced was evident in the quality of the finished product. Opinions as to the quality of the arguments advanced varied.